Tuesday, March 28, 2017

City Lost Court Case to Cheryl Voight...going to give my Federal lawyer this one!!!!

Remember what Cheryl Voight called the City Council when she defeated them in a court of law???

Cheryl Voight said about the city council "They are bullies; and someone told them that they can't be that." After she won her court case against the city. Boy is that quote appropriate after Richard F. Caraviello, the individual who allegedly lied under oath in a court case that he lost on January 31, 2017, two weeks in a row silenced a Medford citizen for no reason whatsoever.

https://casetext.com/case/voigt-v-city-of-medford


https://casetext.com/case/voigt-v-city-of-medford

Constitutional Law — First Amendment — Misc. Cases — 

Tattooing Is a Constitutionally Protected Form of Expression and Therefore May Not Be Regulated through the Application of the Traditional Broad Discretion Given to Zoning Authorities Over the Granting of Special Permits. Zoning — Ordinances — Misc. Cases — Tattooing Is a Constitutionally Protected Form of Speech and Therefore May Not Be Regulated through the Application of the Traditional Broad Discretion Given to Zoning Authorities Over the Granting of Special Permits. The operation of a tattooing parlor constitutes a form of expression protected by the First Amendment. This opinion holds that a local zoning ordinance authorizing tattooing parlors by special permit, with the granting of such a permit subject to the traditional broad discretion given zoning authorities with respect to special permits for any authorized activity, constitutes an overly broad and therefore unconstitutional prior restraint on the right to free speech.